Job Description
,
, - . No CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. Must preserve all original content word-for-word, no addition, removal, summarizing, rephrasing. So we need to extract the text content from the given HTML, preserving it exactly, then wrap appropriate tags.
We must not add or remove any content. So we need to output the same textual content but with semantic tags.
We need to identify sections: There's a "Contexte" heading, then paragraphs, then "Ce que nous recherchons :", then "Ce que vous ferez :", then a list, then "Compétences professionnelles:", then enumerated lists with sublists, then "En complément,", then list, then "Compétences souhaitées", then list.
We must keep the exact text, including French accents, spaces, punctuation. Also need to preserve line breaks? We'll just output as HTML with for paragraphs and
for headings.
We must not add any extra text like "Here is". Must not add any CSS classes or inline styles.
We must not use or
. Use only ,
, - , maybe
? The instruction says use - for list items. It didn't forbid
, but says use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). However the original includes ordered lists (ol) with lower-alpha. Should we convert them to
? The instruction: "Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". It doesn't say we cannot use
, but to be safe we could keep as it's still a list. However they said use - for list items. Might be interpreted that we should use
- for any list items. But the original content includes ordered lists with letters; converting to unordered would change semantics but not content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to would be a change in markup but not content text. The content text inside - remains same. Changing the list type is not adding/removing text, but changing the tag. Is that allowed? It says "Use
- for list items". So we should comply and use
- for list items, even if originally ordered. That would be a change in markup but not content. Probably acceptable.
We also need to handle nested lists: there is
with inside. We'll convert outer to and inner to as well (still ). But we need to preserve the labeling like "a)", "b)"? The original uses lower-alpha labeling; if we change to , we lose the letters. That would be altering content (the letters are part of the text inside - ? Actually the labeling is not in the text; it's generated by the list style. The original HTML had
and - items with no leading letters in the text. Changing to
would change the visual representation but not the text content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing list type does not add/remove text content, but could be considered changing presentation. However they explicitly said use - for list items, so we must follow that.
Thus we will convert all
and to - . Keep the inner text exactly.
We also need to strip out all style attributes, classes, etc. So we will produce plain tags.
We need to ensure we keep the exact text inside each element, including spaces and punctuation.
Let's extract the text content from the given HTML.
I'll manually parse.
The HTML snippet:
Contexte
So the text: "Contexte " (with a non-breaking space after). We need to preserve the space? It's which is a space. We'll output as a regular space? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The is a character entity representing a non-breaking space. Should we keep it as a space? Probably we can output a regular space; but to be precise we could keep the entity? However outputting HTML, the entity will be interpreted as a space. Safer to output a regular space. But the instruction says word-for-word; the original source includes " " as characters. If we output a regular space, we changed the characters. However typical cleaning would replace with space. I think it's acceptable.
We'll output "Contexte " (with a space). Then wrap in ? The heading "Contexte" is a section header. According to rules, use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). "Contexte" is like a heading, so we should use Contexte
. The original had a non-breaking space after; we can trim? Probably keep as "Contexte". We'll output Contexte
.
Next paragraph:
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
We need to output that as a with the exact text inside (including the French quotes, accents). We'll strip tags.
So
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
Next there is an empty paragraph with :
. That's just a non-breaking space. We could output an empty with a space? Or maybe we can ignore empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we need to keep that empty paragraph? It contains a non-breaking space. If we output
(a space) that preserves content. But maybe we can output
. However they said no
tags, but with space is fine.
But maybe we can collapse multiple empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we should keep it. However typical cleaning might drop empty paragraphs. I'd rather keep it as
. But note that the original had which is a non-breaking space; we can output a regular space.
Next paragraph: Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Output as Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Next empty paragraph with again:
. We'll output
.
Next paragraph: Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Output as Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que nous recherchons :
That's a heading. Use Ce que nous recherchons :
. Note the colon and space before? The text includes a space before colon? Actually "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? In French typography, there is a narrow space before colon, but here it's a regular space? The original shows "Ce que nous recherchons :" with a space before colon? It shows a space then colon? Actually the string: "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? It shows "recherchons :" with a space before colon? It's "recherchons :" (space then colon). We'll keep exactly as given: "Ce que nous recherchons :". So Ce que nous recherchons :
.
Next paragraph: Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Output as Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que vous ferez :
Output Ce que vous ferez :
.
Next paragraph: En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
Note there is a non-breaking space before colon? Actually "NRC :" includes before colon. We'll output as "NRC :" (space then colon). So En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
.
Then a with several - items each containing a
. We need to convert to
- and keep the text inside each
- (the
content). We'll strip the
tags inside
- and just put the text directly inside
- . However we must preserve the text exactly, including any internal punctuation. The
- items have a
with text and maybe trailing spaces. We'll output
- text
.
Let's extract each - text:
First
- :
L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;
Text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" followed by (non-breaking space) before closing. We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (maybe keep trailing space? We'll trim? Better to keep exactly: there is a space before the semicolon? Actually text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " There is a space before semicolon? It shows "... risques ; " So there is a space, then semicolon, then . We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (space before semicolon? Actually there is a space before semicolon? The phrase: "gestion des risques ;" Usually French puts a space before semicolon. So there is a space before semicolon. We'll keep that. Then after semicolon there is which is a space. We'll output a space after semicolon? The original had a space, semicolon, then (another space). So effectively two spaces? We'll just output a single space after semicolon? To be safe, we can output exactly as rendered: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " (space before semicolon, semicolon, space after). We'll output that.
Second - :
La gestion financière ;
Text: "La gestion financière ;" plus space and . Output "La gestion financière ; ".
Third - :
La gestion des ressources humaines ;
Output "La gestion des ressources humaines ; ".
Fourth - :
La gestion logistique et des achats ;
Output "La gestion logistique et des achats ; ".
Fifth - :
Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ;
Output "Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ; ".
Sixth - :
Translated by AI — may not be perfect
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝
. Must preserve all original content word-for-word, no addition, removal, summarizing, rephrasing. So we need to extract the text content from the given HTML, preserving it exactly, then wrap appropriate tags. We must not add or remove any content. So we need to output the same textual content but with semantic tags. We need to identify sections: There's a "Contexte" heading, then paragraphs, then "Ce que nous recherchons :", then "Ce que vous ferez :", then a list, then "Compétences professionnelles:", then enumerated lists with sublists, then "En complément,", then list, then "Compétences souhaitées", then list. We must keep the exact text, including French accents, spaces, punctuation. Also need to preserve line breaks? We'll just output as HTML with
for paragraphs and
for headings.
We must not add any extra text like "Here is". Must not add any CSS classes or inline styles.
We must not use or
. Use only ,
, - , maybe
? The instruction says use - for list items. It didn't forbid
, but says use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). However the original includes ordered lists (ol) with lower-alpha. Should we convert them to
? The instruction: "Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". It doesn't say we cannot use
, but to be safe we could keep as it's still a list. However they said use - for list items. Might be interpreted that we should use
- for any list items. But the original content includes ordered lists with letters; converting to unordered would change semantics but not content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to would be a change in markup but not content text. The content text inside - remains same. Changing the list type is not adding/removing text, but changing the tag. Is that allowed? It says "Use
- for list items". So we should comply and use
- for list items, even if originally ordered. That would be a change in markup but not content. Probably acceptable.
We also need to handle nested lists: there is
with inside. We'll convert outer to and inner to as well (still ). But we need to preserve the labeling like "a)", "b)"? The original uses lower-alpha labeling; if we change to , we lose the letters. That would be altering content (the letters are part of the text inside - ? Actually the labeling is not in the text; it's generated by the list style. The original HTML had
and - items with no leading letters in the text. Changing to
would change the visual representation but not the text content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing list type does not add/remove text content, but could be considered changing presentation. However they explicitly said use - for list items, so we must follow that.
Thus we will convert all
and to - . Keep the inner text exactly.
We also need to strip out all style attributes, classes, etc. So we will produce plain tags.
We need to ensure we keep the exact text inside each element, including spaces and punctuation.
Let's extract the text content from the given HTML.
I'll manually parse.
The HTML snippet:
Contexte
So the text: "Contexte " (with a non-breaking space after). We need to preserve the space? It's which is a space. We'll output as a regular space? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The is a character entity representing a non-breaking space. Should we keep it as a space? Probably we can output a regular space; but to be precise we could keep the entity? However outputting HTML, the entity will be interpreted as a space. Safer to output a regular space. But the instruction says word-for-word; the original source includes " " as characters. If we output a regular space, we changed the characters. However typical cleaning would replace with space. I think it's acceptable.
We'll output "Contexte " (with a space). Then wrap in ? The heading "Contexte" is a section header. According to rules, use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). "Contexte" is like a heading, so we should use Contexte
. The original had a non-breaking space after; we can trim? Probably keep as "Contexte". We'll output Contexte
.
Next paragraph:
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
We need to output that as a with the exact text inside (including the French quotes, accents). We'll strip tags.
So
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
Next there is an empty paragraph with :
. That's just a non-breaking space. We could output an empty with a space? Or maybe we can ignore empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we need to keep that empty paragraph? It contains a non-breaking space. If we output
(a space) that preserves content. But maybe we can output
. However they said no
tags, but with space is fine.
But maybe we can collapse multiple empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we should keep it. However typical cleaning might drop empty paragraphs. I'd rather keep it as
. But note that the original had which is a non-breaking space; we can output a regular space.
Next paragraph: Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Output as Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Next empty paragraph with again:
. We'll output
.
Next paragraph: Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Output as Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que nous recherchons :
That's a heading. Use Ce que nous recherchons :
. Note the colon and space before? The text includes a space before colon? Actually "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? In French typography, there is a narrow space before colon, but here it's a regular space? The original shows "Ce que nous recherchons :" with a space before colon? It shows a space then colon? Actually the string: "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? It shows "recherchons :" with a space before colon? It's "recherchons :" (space then colon). We'll keep exactly as given: "Ce que nous recherchons :". So Ce que nous recherchons :
.
Next paragraph: Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Output as Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que vous ferez :
Output Ce que vous ferez :
.
Next paragraph: En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
Note there is a non-breaking space before colon? Actually "NRC :" includes before colon. We'll output as "NRC :" (space then colon). So En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
.
Then a with several - items each containing a
. We need to convert to
- and keep the text inside each
- (the
content). We'll strip the
tags inside
- and just put the text directly inside
- . However we must preserve the text exactly, including any internal punctuation. The
- items have a
with text and maybe trailing spaces. We'll output
- text
.
Let's extract each - text:
First
- :
L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;
Text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" followed by (non-breaking space) before closing. We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (maybe keep trailing space? We'll trim? Better to keep exactly: there is a space before the semicolon? Actually text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " There is a space before semicolon? It shows "... risques ; " So there is a space, then semicolon, then . We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (space before semicolon? Actually there is a space before semicolon? The phrase: "gestion des risques ;" Usually French puts a space before semicolon. So there is a space before semicolon. We'll keep that. Then after semicolon there is which is a space. We'll output a space after semicolon? The original had a space, semicolon, then (another space). So effectively two spaces? We'll just output a single space after semicolon? To be safe, we can output exactly as rendered: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " (space before semicolon, semicolon, space after). We'll output that.
Second - :
La gestion financière ;
Text: "La gestion financière ;" plus space and . Output "La gestion financière ; ".
Third - :
La gestion des ressources humaines ;
Output "La gestion des ressources humaines ; ".
Fourth - :
La gestion logistique et des achats ;
Output "La gestion logistique et des achats ; ".
Fifth - :
Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ;
Output "Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ; ".
Sixth - :
Translated by AI — may not be perfect
. Use only
,
, - , maybe
? The instruction says use - for list items. It didn't forbid
, but says use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). However the original includes ordered lists (ol) with lower-alpha. Should we convert them to
? The instruction: "Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". It doesn't say we cannot use
, but to be safe we could keep as it's still a list. However they said use - for list items. Might be interpreted that we should use
- for any list items. But the original content includes ordered lists with letters; converting to unordered would change semantics but not content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to would be a change in markup but not content text. The content text inside - remains same. Changing the list type is not adding/removing text, but changing the tag. Is that allowed? It says "Use
- for list items". So we should comply and use
- for list items, even if originally ordered. That would be a change in markup but not content. Probably acceptable.
We also need to handle nested lists: there is
with inside. We'll convert outer to and inner to as well (still ). But we need to preserve the labeling like "a)", "b)"? The original uses lower-alpha labeling; if we change to , we lose the letters. That would be altering content (the letters are part of the text inside - ? Actually the labeling is not in the text; it's generated by the list style. The original HTML had
and - items with no leading letters in the text. Changing to
would change the visual representation but not the text content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing list type does not add/remove text content, but could be considered changing presentation. However they explicitly said use - for list items, so we must follow that.
Thus we will convert all
and to - . Keep the inner text exactly.
We also need to strip out all style attributes, classes, etc. So we will produce plain tags.
We need to ensure we keep the exact text inside each element, including spaces and punctuation.
Let's extract the text content from the given HTML.
I'll manually parse.
The HTML snippet:
Contexte
So the text: "Contexte " (with a non-breaking space after). We need to preserve the space? It's which is a space. We'll output as a regular space? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The is a character entity representing a non-breaking space. Should we keep it as a space? Probably we can output a regular space; but to be precise we could keep the entity? However outputting HTML, the entity will be interpreted as a space. Safer to output a regular space. But the instruction says word-for-word; the original source includes " " as characters. If we output a regular space, we changed the characters. However typical cleaning would replace with space. I think it's acceptable.
We'll output "Contexte " (with a space). Then wrap in ? The heading "Contexte" is a section header. According to rules, use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). "Contexte" is like a heading, so we should use Contexte
. The original had a non-breaking space after; we can trim? Probably keep as "Contexte". We'll output Contexte
.
Next paragraph:
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
We need to output that as a with the exact text inside (including the French quotes, accents). We'll strip tags.
So
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
Next there is an empty paragraph with :
. That's just a non-breaking space. We could output an empty with a space? Or maybe we can ignore empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we need to keep that empty paragraph? It contains a non-breaking space. If we output
(a space) that preserves content. But maybe we can output
. However they said no
tags, but with space is fine.
But maybe we can collapse multiple empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we should keep it. However typical cleaning might drop empty paragraphs. I'd rather keep it as
. But note that the original had which is a non-breaking space; we can output a regular space.
Next paragraph: Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Output as Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Next empty paragraph with again:
. We'll output
.
Next paragraph: Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Output as Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que nous recherchons :
That's a heading. Use Ce que nous recherchons :
. Note the colon and space before? The text includes a space before colon? Actually "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? In French typography, there is a narrow space before colon, but here it's a regular space? The original shows "Ce que nous recherchons :" with a space before colon? It shows a space then colon? Actually the string: "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? It shows "recherchons :" with a space before colon? It's "recherchons :" (space then colon). We'll keep exactly as given: "Ce que nous recherchons :". So Ce que nous recherchons :
.
Next paragraph: Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Output as Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
.
Next heading: Ce que vous ferez :
Output Ce que vous ferez :
.
Next paragraph: En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
Note there is a non-breaking space before colon? Actually "NRC :" includes before colon. We'll output as "NRC :" (space then colon). So En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
.
Then a with several - items each containing a
. We need to convert to
- and keep the text inside each
- (the
content). We'll strip the
tags inside
- and just put the text directly inside
- . However we must preserve the text exactly, including any internal punctuation. The
- items have a
with text and maybe trailing spaces. We'll output
- text
.
Let's extract each - text:
First
- :
L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;
Text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" followed by (non-breaking space) before closing. We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (maybe keep trailing space? We'll trim? Better to keep exactly: there is a space before the semicolon? Actually text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " There is a space before semicolon? It shows "... risques ; " So there is a space, then semicolon, then . We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (space before semicolon? Actually there is a space before semicolon? The phrase: "gestion des risques ;" Usually French puts a space before semicolon. So there is a space before semicolon. We'll keep that. Then after semicolon there is which is a space. We'll output a space after semicolon? The original had a space, semicolon, then (another space). So effectively two spaces? We'll just output a single space after semicolon? To be safe, we can output exactly as rendered: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " (space before semicolon, semicolon, space after). We'll output that.
Second - :
La gestion financière ;
Text: "La gestion financière ;" plus space and . Output "La gestion financière ; ".
Third - :
La gestion des ressources humaines ;
Output "La gestion des ressources humaines ; ".
Fourth - :
La gestion logistique et des achats ;
Output "La gestion logistique et des achats ; ".
Fifth - :
Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ;
Output "Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ; ".
Sixth - :
Translated by AI — may not be perfect
- ? The instruction says use
- for list items. It didn't forbid
- , but says use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). However the original includes ordered lists (ol) with lower-alpha. Should we convert them to
- ? The instruction: "Use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". It doesn't say we cannot use
- , but to be safe we could keep
- for list items. Might be interpreted that we should use
- for any list items. But the original content includes ordered lists with letters; converting to unordered would change semantics but not content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
- to
- remains same. Changing the list type is not adding/removing text, but changing the tag. Is that allowed? It says "Use
- for list items". So we should comply and use
- for list items, even if originally ordered. That would be a change in markup but not content. Probably acceptable.
We also need to handle nested lists: there is
- with
- ? Actually the labeling is not in the text; it's generated by the list style. The original HTML had
- and
- items with no leading letters in the text. Changing to
- would change the visual representation but not the text content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing list type does not add/remove text content, but could be considered changing presentation. However they explicitly said use
- for list items, so we must follow that.
Thus we will convert all
- and
- . Keep the inner text exactly.
We also need to strip out all style attributes, classes, etc. So we will produce plain tags.
We need to ensure we keep the exact text inside each element, including spaces and punctuation.
Let's extract the text content from the given HTML.
I'll manually parse.
The HTML snippet:
Contexte
So the text: "Contexte " (with a non-breaking space after). We need to preserve the space? It's which is a space. We'll output as a regular space? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. The is a character entity representing a non-breaking space. Should we keep it as a space? Probably we can output a regular space; but to be precise we could keep the entity? However outputting HTML, the entity will be interpreted as a space. Safer to output a regular space. But the instruction says word-for-word; the original source includes " " as characters. If we output a regular space, we changed the characters. However typical cleaning would replace with space. I think it's acceptable. We'll output "Contexte " (with a space). Then wrap in? The heading "Contexte" is a section header. According to rules, use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). "Contexte" is like a heading, so we should use
Contexte
. The original had a non-breaking space after; we can trim? Probably keep as "Contexte". We'll outputContexte
. Next paragraph:L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
We need to output that as awith the exact text inside (including the French quotes, accents). We'll strip tags. So
L’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale fait face à des crises multiples et convergentes, marquées par la dégradation des dynamiques sécuritaires et politiques, les chocs climatiques, l’augmentation des besoins humanitaires et la contraction des financements. Dans ce contexte, l’accès et l’acceptation de l’aide humanitaire sont de plus en plus complexes, tandis que les mécanismes de coordination et la capacité d’influence des acteurs humanitaires demeurent inégaux selon les pays.
Next there is an empty paragraph with :
. That's just a non-breaking space. We could output an emptywith a space? Or maybe we can ignore empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we need to keep that empty paragraph? It contains a non-breaking space. If we output
(a space) that preserves content. But maybe we can output
. However they said no
tags, butwith space is fine. But maybe we can collapse multiple empty paragraphs? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. So we should keep it. However typical cleaning might drop empty paragraphs. I'd rather keep it as
. But note that the original had which is a non-breaking space; we can output a regular space. Next paragraph:Créé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Output asCréé en 2025, le Forum des ONG en Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale (FONGA) est une plateforme régionale de coordination qui vise à renforcer la coordination, le plaidoyer et l’influence des ONG nationales et internationales et de leurs structures faîtières intervenant dans les domaines humanitaire, du développement et de la paix. Il regroupe aujourd’hui 59 membres, dont 20 forums d’ONG nationaux et 39 représentations régionales d’ONG, couvrant 12 pays d’Afrique de l’Ouest et centrale.
Next empty paragraph with again:
. We'll output
. Next paragraph:Afin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Output asAfin d’accompagner son développement institutionnel et son autonomisation progressive, le FONGA recrute un(e) Support Manager. Le poste contribuera au développement et à la consolidation des fonctions support et des systèmes de gestion du Forum, ainsi qu’à la mise en œuvre de sa feuille de route d’autonomisation, dans le cadre du dispositif de hosting actuellement assuré par le Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
. Next heading:Ce que nous recherchons :
That's a heading. UseCe que nous recherchons :
. Note the colon and space before? The text includes a space before colon? Actually "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? In French typography, there is a narrow space before colon, but here it's a regular space? The original shows "Ce que nous recherchons :" with a space before colon? It shows a space then colon? Actually the string: "Ce que nous recherchons :" includes a space before colon? It shows "recherchons :" with a space before colon? It's "recherchons :" (space then colon). We'll keep exactly as given: "Ce que nous recherchons :". SoCe que nous recherchons :
. Next paragraph:Le/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Output asLe/la Support Manager joue un rôle central dans le développement, la structuration et le pilotage des fonctions support du FONGA. Sous la supervision de la Directrice, il/elle assure la gestion des fonctions administratives, financières, des ressources humaines, logistiques et de conformité du Forum, tout en contribuant au développement de systèmes de gestion efficaces et au renforcement progressif de son autonomie institutionnelle.
Next empty paragraph with :
. Output
. Next heading:Ce que vous ferez :
OutputCe que vous ferez :
. Next paragraph:En conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
Note there is a non-breaking space before colon? Actually "NRC :" includes before colon. We'll output as "NRC :" (space then colon). SoEn conformité et en respectant les politiques, procédures et lignes directrices de NRC :
. Then a- with several
- items each containing a
. We need to convert to
- and keep the text inside each
- (the
content). We'll strip the
tags inside
- and just put the text directly inside
- . However we must preserve the text exactly, including any internal punctuation. The
- items have a
with text and maybe trailing spaces. We'll output
- text . Let's extract each
- text: First
- :
L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;
Text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" followed by (non-breaking space) before closing. We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (maybe keep trailing space? We'll trim? Better to keep exactly: there is a space before the semicolon? Actually text: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " There is a space before semicolon? It shows "... risques ; " So there is a space, then semicolon, then . We'll output "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ;" (space before semicolon? Actually there is a space before semicolon? The phrase: "gestion des risques ;" Usually French puts a space before semicolon. So there is a space before semicolon. We'll keep that. Then after semicolon there is which is a space. We'll output a space after semicolon? The original had a space, semicolon, then (another space). So effectively two spaces? We'll just output a single space after semicolon? To be safe, we can output exactly as rendered: "L'administration, la conformité et la gestion des risques ; " (space before semicolon, semicolon, space after). We'll output that. Second - :
La gestion financière ;
Text: "La gestion financière ;" plus space and . Output "La gestion financière ; ". Third - :
La gestion des ressources humaines ;
Output "La gestion des ressources humaines ; ". Fourth - :
La gestion logistique et des achats ;
Output "La gestion logistique et des achats ; ". Fifth - :
Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ;
Output "Le développement institutionnel et l'autonomisation du Forum ; ". Sixth - :
Translated by AI — may not be perfect
- items each containing a
- to
- . Keep the inner text exactly.
We also need to strip out all style attributes, classes, etc. So we will produce plain tags.
We need to ensure we keep the exact text inside each element, including spaces and punctuation.
Let's extract the text content from the given HTML.
I'll manually parse.
The HTML snippet:
- for list items, so we must follow that.
Thus we will convert all
- items with no leading letters in the text. Changing to
- inside. We'll convert outer
- to
- and inner
- to
- as well (still
- ). But we need to preserve the labeling like "a)", "b)"? The original uses lower-alpha labeling; if we change to
- , we lose the letters. That would be altering content (the letters are part of the text inside
- ? Actually the labeling is not in the text; it's generated by the list style. The original HTML had
- for list items, even if originally ordered. That would be a change in markup but not content. Probably acceptable.
We also need to handle nested lists: there is
- for list items". So we should comply and use
- would be a change in markup but not content text. The content text inside
- remains same. Changing the list type is not adding/removing text, but changing the tag. Is that allowed? It says "Use
- for any list items. But the original content includes ordered lists with letters; converting to unordered would change semantics but not content. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
- as it's still a list. However they said use
- for list items. Might be interpreted that we should use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills)". It doesn't say we cannot use
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). However the original includes ordered lists (ol) with lower-alpha. Should we convert them to
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.